Being up alone for two hours afforded far too much time for quiet reflection. I am fairly convinced most humans manage to avoid that these says, even those, like me, who understand its importance. But when I do stop and look, too often I don't like what I see looking back at me. How did I become this? Is this really me? Where does personality and artifice begin and end? I've spent so many years building up various personas, erecting alter egos, tearing them down, rebuilding, and I have to wonder if I'm still in there. Worse still, I have to wonder if I ever was in there? Yeah, getting all existential and shit, but I'm serious. I consider myself with any (inherently doomed attempt) at objectivity, and, more often than not, I'm entirely perplexed at the person I see. Do I even like this woman? Would anyone? Am I far too hard on myself? Am I failing to factor in all the most important known variables? Am I falling into a hundred different winnowing traps created by generations Y and Z, the Echo Boomers and the iGeneration? Am I not everything that is anathema to this new world of obsessive virtual socializing, freely relinquished privacy, and unwarranted optimism? Writing this, it's taking on aspects of a grotesque sort of apparent self parody. Silly Ol' Aunt Beast, that unfeeling, sharp-tongued windbag. Just a sad little goat girl lost in time and space, loony as a fruitcake, tumbling down the abyss of her own navel. Okay – hahahahahah – but enough of this.
I've been told again and again that no one reads long paragraphs if they appear online (actually, I was being told that about print in 1985, when I worked for the college paper). If this is so, I don't have to erase anything I've just said. If it's not...
---
Today is Andre the Giant's Birthday. He has a posse, and likely always shall.
---
Yesterday, I spent many hours rebuilding Alabaster: Wolves #5. And it's done, except for one logistical problem, which I only solved an hour after I was done with the last page (I'll fix that today or tomorrow). It's a much darker ending than the original one. It's also vastly less convoluted. I'll send it to my editor on Monday.
Oh, and my comp copy of David Hartwell and Jacob Weisman's The Sword and Sorcery Anthology (Tachyon Press), which reprints my S&S story, "The Sea Troll's Daughter," arrived yesterday. Which I maintain is one of my most underrated and, possibly, misunderstood tales. I am the stealth feminist, gender criminal incognito, she who shatters "genre" conventions well out of sight! Oh, also, Hartwell and Weisman's book is not to be confused with L. Sprague De Camp's 1963 anthology of the same name. It helps avoid confusion that Hartwell and Weisman actually include female authors (well, 4 women to 19 men). Anyway, yes, "The Sea Troll's Daughter," plus Rachel Pollack, Joanna Russ, Jane Yolen, and a bunch of dudes. I'm going to shut up about this book now, before I allow as how there's really no excuse for having included so few female writers. In the early 1960s, De Camp might possibly have fairly made that argument; no one today can.
---
Pizza from Fellini's on Wickenden Street last night, then two Kid Night movies. Both of which we saw last year in theaters, but both of which I've been wanting to see at least a second time. We started with Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.'s The Thing (prequel to Carpenter's 1982 film, which was a remake of Christian Nyby and Howard Hawk's 1951 The Thing from Another World, the first of three film adaptations of John W. Campbell, Jr.'s 1938 short story, "Who Goes There"). All in all, there really is a lot to like about this film, but, on the other hand, I think, in the end, if falls flat, and I hate saying that. It makes an enormous blunder right off, by eschewing the unrelenting claustrophobia and sense of isolation, that are two of the elements that made Carpenter's film so powerful, by leaving Antarctica and inserting an unnecessary scene at Columbia University. The director and screenwriter could easily have gotten Dr. Sander Halvorson from New York to Antarctica without dragging the viewer away from the Norwegian camp. For starters, if they'd have done their homework, they'd known that, in 1982, there were paleontologists working on Seymour Island on the Antarctic Peninsula, and the whole Columbia University digression wasn't even necessary. Anyway...I likely had more praise for this film when I saw it in the theater. And, like I said, there's a lot to like...the creature design, for example. But there's just not enough to like...
Our second feature was the extended version of Jon Favreau's Cowboys and Aliens. I loved it the first time I saw it, and I love it even more now. The tide of critical opinion be damned. It's a wonderful, fun, and surprisingly poignant film. Ford, Craig, Clancy Brown, Olivia Wilde, and Keith Carradine all deliver fine performances in a "genre" mashup someone should have done this well long before. The design of the spacecraft and its mining technology is better than the creature design, but both are quite good. I'm pretty sure the studio, distributors, theaters, and filmgoers simply had no idea what to make of this film. It straddles categories and really fits nowhere convenient and marketable. Which is a point in its favor. Like this year's John Carter, it might have been a box-office bomb, but that doesn't get in the way of it being a hell of a lot of fun.
So...I think I'm taking today off. It's warm and green. The sun is shining in the sky. There's not a cloud in sight...
Yeah, Quoting ELO (I'm Old, Okay?),
Aunt Beast
- Current Location:The Hornburg
- Current Mood:
hmmmmm
- Current Music:Stars, "Your Ex-Lover Is Dead"
Comments
Shame, because those moments of quiet contemplation are how we refresh our souls.
Won't comment on the soul part, as I deny their existence (or at last know we cannot know). But...
Introspection is not a virtue in most of the modern world. It belies blind certainty. Society rewards you if you fix upon a target and travel towards it with sociopathic abandon. Pausing to contemplate the path back and the path forward seems a weakness; time lost to useless action.
Yes!
I didn't realize there was an extended version of the film; I would have tried to watch it instead of the theatrical cut (which I enjoyed) if I'd known. What are the differences?
I'm not sure that introspection is only another form of self-parody. There should be something there for the mirrors to reflect endlessly away.
What are the differences?
Well, there's a whole scene between Craig and Ford inside the alien ship (good scene), and lots of little snippets here and there.
I'm not sure that introspection is only another form of self-parody. There should be something there for the mirrors to reflect endlessly away.
Oh, I didn't mean it has to become self-parody. No. I only mean that, in that cases, I felt it was.
Have you tried a practice of regular meditation? You may find it healing -- especially for those angrifying moments the world presents (as it seems to do, at least for me, daily).
Have you tried a practice of regular meditation?
No. I know I never will. My mind cannot be soothed or cleared. I don't even especially long for it to be, not in that sense. I simply have no interest in meditation.
Introspection (and/or meditation) is when you ask those hard questions about the you for which you are projecting. Projecting often times is really who we are at the core in a pixelated sense (without getting to matrix'y here).
Ah, but it's not as if we can prove we're anything more than avatars in a video game....
I can't seem to write in anything but long paragraphs.
A paragraph should be the length it needs to be.
I keep questioning why there are so many people and just where the heck are they going?
Keep asking yourself that question. Too few people do.
As do I. And (wait for it) EIGHT-TRACK TAPES!
There's an extended version of Cowboys and Aliens?!?
Yep.
The gap between myself and my students grows into a gulf based on those three things.
I feel this way about the entire world.
I know what you mean (from my own perspective, of course) about looking at myself and ending up perplexed. It's not that "here" is awful, necessarily, but it certainly isn't anywhere that I ever planned to be. And I can't figure out where the "there" I was looking for even is.
As often as I can, I go to the mountains, or at least to the woods. I try to wander around in the closest thing to solitude I can find. While I'm there, it doesn't seem to matter that I don't really like facebook but caved in order to stay in touch with distant family and friends. My cellphone frequently doesn't have a signal, so I don't have to feel guilty about refusing a call. Sometimes I'll take a book with me - my beloved old tech on the top of a mountain takes the edge off for a time.
But I always have to come back down.
It's not that I'm a Luddite - I don't hate all the new gizmos and toys. But I prefer to view them as tools to use, and more and more it feels like they are using me.
And if that's a too-long paragraph, then Dickens is doomed!
I hope you did take the day off and enjoy the sun and warmth.
Didn't work out that way.
And I can't figure out where the "there" I was looking for even is.
Unfortunately, I can. This isn't it.
But I always have to come back down.
Same with drugs, unfortunately.
(Sorry. I'm not being glib.)
But when I do stop and look, too often I don't like what I see looking back at me. How did I become this? Is this really me? Where does personality and artifice begin and end? I've spent so many years building up various personas, erecting alter egos, tearing them down, rebuilding, and I have to wonder if I'm still in there. Worse still, I have to wonder if I ever was in there? Yeah, getting all existential and shit, but I'm serious. I consider myself with any (inherently doomed attempt) at objectivity, and, more often than not, I'm entirely perplexed at the person I see.
Me: it's 3 a.m. and I reallly am rolling this around in my head. When I was in grad school and teaching, I had these really nicely defined "selves". There was the student/intellectual self, the teacher/authority self, the home/loving self. Every once in a while I think that these selves are unworthy and look for better ones. I've tried on other selves after getting a different grad degree and liked that one a lot...intil suddenly I didn't. Now I'm floating uselessly with no really well-defined self and I'm not sure what to do with that.
Is this really me?
Ultimately, the answer is self-evident: Yes. We are the person asking the question, no matter how far from any hypothetical and desired us that person might be.
I got my phone kindasorta fixed, and just now realised I forgot to tell you. But now you can message me for RP, the lie has been made true again.
I have a new job, kind of, freelancing book covers. This means I can buy Alabaster: Wolves and I am pleased. Hopefully back-issues can be had when my pay lands. It's slow and unreliable.
there's really no excuse for having included so few female writers
And yet, the excuses flow. Women don't write relevant stories, their interests are just *different* from normal people's, it's probably biology, and besides they didn't really *try* to get into the anthology, and there's women-only anthologies so it's pretty unfair not to have men-only anthologies, and things are worse in Afghanistan so you've nothing to complain about. Etc. Always the same.
Half awake this morning, I did the numbers, and I've had my heart toyed with and/or broken thirteen times. Time to stop.
Finally got into the Secret World open beta. It's... a mixed bag. The graphics and mechanics are a bit average, but the story and quests are gorgeous. There's quests where you have to be dead to do them. There's puzzle quests that are *really* hard. There's poetry and ambiance. There's wonder. I'm going to buy it for that.
I got into one of the closed betas, spent all day downloading, and then my computer decided the game was too much and wouldn't run it.
Hopefully, by the time the game is out for a while and all the bugs are worked out, I'll have a machine that can deal with it.
I identify with *EVERY SINGLE WORD* of this. I've had many an early morning/late night "long dark teatime of the soul" asking myself these exact same questions. Sometimes when I really like to feel bad about myself I imagine my teenage self meeting myself now and I wonder if the earlier me would even know me.
I must admit I kind of reject the post-modern idea that there is no such thing as an essentially personality or "self;" according to post-modernism the "self" is made up of an amalgamation of experiences, personae, social influences, etc. I still believe in an essential Cartesian self. However, I do worry about how much my essential "self" is getting buried and atrophying under all the shite I've accumulated along the way - career, social commitments, educational commitments, various dependencies and neuroses, etc.
"Where are the feasts we were promised?" ("The Doors") Although I can't blame anyone for my feeling this way, when I was growing up I'd somehow absorbed the idea that everything would be open to me once I was an adult and that I'd live some kind of glorious life. Have you read "Absolution" by Fitzgerald (the unofficial prologue to "Gatsby")? In it, the priest advises the young boy who comes to him for confession to be at "the center of the world" where "things go glimmering." Well, my life right now involves a lot more dirty dishes, piles of laundry, cats who puke on the carpet, grades to submit, student papers to correct, and otherwise boring and mundane things than it does "glimmering." And, as much as I love my job and my cats and my partner, I can't still help but feeling deep down that there is still that "golden path" somewhere and I've just never found it.
On a lighter note, I am going to buy the second issue of "Alabaster" this week; I can't wait to read it!
Best,
Jaime
I must admit I kind of reject the post-modern idea that there is no such thing as an essentially personality or "self;" according to post-modernism the "self" is made up of an amalgamation of experiences, personae, social influences, etc. I still believe in an essential Cartesian self. However, I do worry about how much my essential "self" is getting buried and atrophying under all the shite I've accumulated along the way - career, social commitments, educational commitments, various dependencies and neuroses, etc.
See...I don't know. This reply probably warrants an essay I haven't time to write. But I can't claim to believe in any sort of essential "self." We are merely the sum of our individual histories, crossed with our individual genotypes. Now, it's possible, being what we are, that we can play a role in shaping the nature of the being we are, but, even then, the drive to do so and the ways we try to fro so, those things are also dictated by the sum of our individual histories and our genotypes. The loop is pretty much inescapable.
As for "glimmering." Well, I don't blame Scott. There were things he wanted to be true, as if the came with us all.
On a lighter note, I am going to buy the second issue of "Alabaster" this week; I can't wait to read it!
Thank you!
At least someone does.
"[T]umbling down the abyss of her own navel", that's fucking brilliant.
Thank you, though, I actually have the Omphalos to thank.
And yes, anathema feels so good in the mouth it ought to be profanity.