?

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Fuck the bozos!

I do not think this will be so eloquent a post as yesterday's, though it might well be as angry. I dreamed angry dreams and woke up angry. The nanobot is working overtime, lodged deep in my amygdala (yes, Nebari have those, too), whispering to my forebrain, reminding it how I ought to be angry, how, in fact, I ought to be furious.

For example, this morning, half-asleep, I picked up this week's issue of Creative Loafing, Atlanta's "alternative" paper (hardly perfect, but a far sight better than the good-ol'-boy neofascism of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution), and with my squinty, unawake eyes beheld (on p. 50, left-hand side) a top-to-bottom ad for the Southeastern Literary Journal and Small Press Fair. Oh, yeah. Try talking to most of these people about fantasy and weird fiction, and see how long it takes them to get that why-must-I-endure-such-riff-raff, annoyed cat expression on their faces. But, hey, you can attend workshops for "aspiring writers," fiction and poetry workshops (Americans feel a lot better about writing if they use good, solid Proletariat words like "work" and "shop" when doing so). "Well," I said to Spooky, who was making her coffee. "I shouldn't be so judgmental. They're better than me, aren't they? I mean, it's not like they have to write for their supper. I'm a whore. They're just sluts."

So, the next thing I encounter in Creative Loafing, turning to page 61, is a snotty, half-assed review of Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. I knew, when I saw it, that it was the sort of film that would drive the art film/film snob/film geek bozos bugfrell. That it was the sort of film they'd see, knowing they'd hate it, just so they could complain. And I was right. And the best this asshole, this Heather Kuldell, could come up with was criticism on the order of "Capt. Franky [sic] Cook (Angelina Jolie) sports a form-fitting uniform and an eye patch, disproving the long-held belief that pilots need two eyes for proper depth perception." Flippant crap like this, masquerading as criticism, drives me nuts. It's like the people who complained that, in Batman Returns, Michelle Pfeiffer never could have made Catwoman's outfit from the stuff in her closet. Or they complain that Star Wars was a bad film because there's no sound in space, and X-wing fighters wouldn't bank, and Han Solo doesn't understand that a parsec is a measure of distance not of time, and, while we're at it, the dialogue is simplistic, hokey, and the plot is unoriginal. The sort of people who complained because automobiles in A.I.: Artificial Intelligence had three wheels, or because the crow in The Crow is actually a raven. In short, the people who just don't get it. "It," in this case, being that sometimes, in art, aesthetics and symbolism outweigh inconvenient, irrelevant fact. Sometimes things happen that way because it's just fucking cool, or pretty, or meaningful on a completely unscientific, unconscious level. A good story, which Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is most assuredly, is not to be bound by the tyranny of fact, unless that is the author's reasoned choice and intent. I was, however, quite pleased to see that Sky Captain... did well at the box office this weekend and that Ebert gave it four stars.

My gods, the cryosphere has been activated. There's no denying it. I can't feel my feet.

I need a drink. It's only 12:54 p.m., but I need a drink.

Yesterday, Spooky and I read all the way through "Bradbury Weather." I was relieved to find that I still like it, two weeks after I last wrote on the story. Bill Schafer (at subpress), whom I let read the first seven thousand words yesterday, thinks I should stop having my first-person narrators draw attention to the weaknesses of first-person narration, but I'm not yet ready to do that. Stop, I mean. I want to write today, and I will try. The next scene is very clear in my head. Actually, the next two scenes are very clear to me. That's a good thing. I also updated the news page on my website for the first time since frelling March. I desperately need a webmaster, someone who could stay on top of things and maybe even do something about my butt-ugly, mid-nineties design. Right now, there's a gap between March and September that I shall fill in later. Gaps piss me off, and, obviously, we need no more of that. Also, yesterday, I began talking with the guy who's doing the Bookslut interview, prequestion questions. I think this is going to be a very good interview. I haven't done many, hardly any, since Spring 2002. I'd done so many, and it was always the same lame questions, that I finally just stopped giving them. I just couldn't stand to answer the same silly questions for the umpteenth time, because interviewers couldn't be bothered to do a little research and see that everyone else had already asked that question, and the answers were archived on my website.

Last night, in an attempt to curb Spooky's rather alarming addiction to Morrowind, we got old school and played Scrabble until after three a.m.

Okay, this has gone on way too long. I spend far too much time on this journal. I have more to say today, but it'll have to wait for a second entry, later on. Someone please get this thing out of my head...

Comments

( 53 comments — Have your say! )
grandmofhelsing
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:45 pm (UTC)
Oh, you're going to just hate my "Sky Captain" review.
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:55 pm (UTC)
Oh, you're going to just hate my "Sky Captain" review.

No, I'm just not going to read it.
velocityb0y
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:49 pm (UTC)
Even the eye-patch criticism is lame. If you're going to complain about realism, WW-2 aircraft retrofitted to be submarines and aircraft carriers floating in the sky with no visible means of support? Obviously realism wasn't an important factor in the film's design. You would think any film critic would know the term "suspension of disbelief."

Sky Captain blew me away. The visuals were stunning, Jude Law and Gwyneth Paltrow made a perfect 40's hero and heroine, and the fast pacing was perfect for the material.

And this week I'm really looking forward to Shaun of the Dead. Maybe the post-summer movie lull won't be so bad this year.
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:22 pm (UTC)
Obviously realism wasn't an important factor in the film's design.

See, the thing is, the reviewer in question didn't hate the film because of the eye patch or any other nitpicky, clueless silliness. She hated the film because it somehow violated her narrow beliefs about what constitutes a good film. I just wish she'd been honest enough and fair enough to the film to treat the movie with more respect. That she was glibbly whining about eye patches was evidence she'd refused the take the film seriously on any level and really didn't think it worth her time. Mostly, I wish people wouldn't go to see movies they've already decided they're going to hate. I absolutely loathed The Day After Tomorrow, but I went into it wanting to be entertained, willing to be schnookered, not arrogantly looking for ways to tear it apart.
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 06:50 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 07:45 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 08:35 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 09:06 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 09:24 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 09:46 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 09:57 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:09 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:38 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 21st, 2004 12:58 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:17 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:24 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 02:20 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 09:51 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:02 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:25 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:43 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:06 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:13 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - robyn_ma - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:17 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:18 am (UTC) - Expand
troublebox
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:53 pm (UTC)
I’m not exactly sure if this is a question you can answer (feel free to delete this comment if I’m impinging on contractually verboten territory) but what’s the sixth novel?… When I first read through your site, I noticed novel-count inconsistencies, but I assumed that was just a typo. Now, your latest news update has me dying to know (“CRK sixth novel, Murder of Angels, was released September 7th”)… Something ghost-written? 5oC, S, T, LRM, MoA … am I missing one?
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:57 pm (UTC)
Something ghost-written?

Yes, but it's a secret I must take to my grave.
(no subject) - troublebox - Sep. 20th, 2004 06:02 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 06:07 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - troublebox - Sep. 20th, 2004 06:09 pm (UTC) - Expand
activistgirl
Sep. 20th, 2004 05:59 pm (UTC)
Not really a complaint, just a question...
In Resident Evil: Apocalypse how do y'all suppose the zombies in the graveyard got zombified? I LOVED the movie but just wanted to see some theories about said scene. My fiance thinks that it was just b/c it was cool and doesn't need an explanation, which I'm willing to accept, just wanted to know if there were any other theories out there...
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Not really a complaint, just a question...
In Resident Evil: Apocalypse how do y'all suppose the zombies in the graveyard got zombified? I LOVED the movie but just wanted to see some theories about said scene. My fiance thinks that it was just b/c it was cool and doesn't need an explanation, which I'm willing to accept, just wanted to know if there were any other theories out there...

I haven't had a chance to see it yet, and I may wait for the DVD (I'm trying to do that more often). So, no, I can offer no theories.
forgottenbelief
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:11 pm (UTC)
Re: Not liking Star Wars because the 'plot is unoriginal'. Now, I don't like Star Wars for a myriad of other reasons (foremost being that I'm a trekkie, and I don't think they mix), but I don't think that calling a plot unoriginal is a complete waste of time. For example: The Matrix. I completely agreed that the movie was visually stunning, I would draw the line when people started to talk about how 'original' the plot was - how many sci-fi books do you have to read to get caught up on the 'this world isn't real' concept, anyway? Doesn't make it not a good movie, but does mean the plot is based on an idea that has been around in sci-fi forever.

...

I really have no point.
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:14 pm (UTC)
(foremost being that I'm a trekkie, and I don't think they mix)

Hey, I'm a scaper, and i think everything mixes. Hell, I'd love to see some Luxans and Klingons and Wookies mix it up.
tjcrowley
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:42 pm (UTC)
There is much the same attitude here in San Francisco -- the unspoken "I'm a LITERARY writer" attitude. Well, I hate to break it to them - they are merely writers, whereas you are an AUTHOR (meaning you actually get paid for it). There is only one person I know here in town that actually writes for a living, for a local newspaper.

As far as Sky Captain goes, I seriously got my suspension of disbelief tweaked when someone referred to "World War I". In 1939. Yeah, ok. Then again, I was the only nitpicker in the audience that would have caught this.
grandmofhelsing
Sep. 20th, 2004 08:38 pm (UTC)
I seriously got my suspension of disbelief tweaked when someone referred to "World War I". In 1939. Yeah, ok. Then again, I was the only nitpicker in the audience that would have caught this.

It was like fingernails on a blackboard to me every time they said "World War I" instead of "The Great War." It is such an elementary and easily corrected mistake, and to make it repeatedly. It's just sloppy writing. Especially since it is so obvious that this alternate universe has suffered neither the Great Depression nor the outbreak of WWII.
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 08:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - grandmofhelsing - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:07 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 20th, 2004 10:45 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tjcrowley - Sep. 21st, 2004 02:37 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 03:46 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tjcrowley - Sep. 21st, 2004 04:00 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 06:36 am (UTC) - Expand
oneirophrenia
Sep. 20th, 2004 06:57 pm (UTC)
As far as film reviews go, I always live by one credo, taken from an old ChemLab t-shirt:

FUCK ART, LET'S KILL

Sure, I like a nice, artsy, clever film as much as everyone does...but I can and will gladly settle for anything beautiful, shallow, and full of robots shooting at one another.
revsweeney
Sep. 20th, 2004 08:19 pm (UTC)
I may be in love...

you just championed several of my "favorite films that other people seem to hate, especially if they're persnickety elitists".

I happen to be a pretty tough fan to please when it comes to movies... I'll gladly point out all the 'flaws' of anything, even the things I like, but sometimes a work is such a *gorgeous* mess, the mess hardly matters. (and by gorgeous I don't just mean visual)

Anyway, yeah... I saw Sky Cap too, and I was blown away. Do the people in it act like *real* people would in those situations? Um... probably not. But they act a hell of a lot like people in sci-fi serials and comics of the 30's and 40's acted. (Self-aware poke in the movie comes when Cap says Dex got an idea from one of his crazy comic books...)

People can't just sit back and enjoy anything these days. At least, not the academic/professional-crit class. I'm *so* glad I'm not in the university culture anymore...really.
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 08:52 pm (UTC)
I'm *so* glad I'm not in the university culture anymore...really.

Same here. I haven't missed that world in ages.
(Deleted comment)
greygirlbeast
Sep. 20th, 2004 10:03 pm (UTC)
I can webmonkey.

And what does it mean to webmonkey?
(no subject) - grandmofhelsing - Sep. 21st, 2004 01:11 am (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 02:29 pm (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - greygirlbeast - Sep. 21st, 2004 11:12 pm (UTC) - Expand
robyn_ma
Sep. 21st, 2004 11:45 pm (UTC)
'I just couldn't stand to answer the same silly questions for the umpteenth time'

asking questions in an interview is so...gauche.

all interviewers should read inner views by david breskin to see how it should be done.
greygirlbeast
Sep. 22nd, 2004 12:12 am (UTC)
asking questions in an interview is so...gauche.

Well, I wouldn't, personally, go quite that far. But I do think that giving the person being interviewed more latitude to talk, to wander farther afield, is a very desirable thing.
( 53 comments — Have your say! )

Latest Month

March 2023
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Comments

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow