During my interview for the job, I rambled on and on about how much I loved animals, that I'd always wanted to work with animals, and so forth, until the manager, a woman who could have been Cruella DeVille's eviler sister, told me that she wasn't interested in people who liked animals, but in people who liked people. More specifically, she was interested in hiring someone who was motivated to sell to people. I lied and said I was both. And much to my surprise, I got the job.
But, as you may well imagine, I was a lousy salesperson. I didn't like to talk to customers. I didn't know how to talk to customers. During my time at Doctor Pet Center I managed to sell only a single dog, an aging basset hound we called Betty, the only older dog I ever saw in the store. I cannot now recall how the store had ended up with Betty, as all the other dogs were puppies. Anyway, yes, I sold Betty, even though she had arthritis. And then the man who bought her brought her back only a week later. And, about a month after that, in November, I quit. (I can proudly say that I've never once been fired from a job. I always quit before my employer had the chance to fire me.)
Not long after I sold Betty, shortly after she was returned, there was an outbreak of Parvo virus one night. There were just two of us working, because it was a slow weeknight. The outbreak started with a husky puppy. Within a couple of hours, I'd hauled half a dozen diarrhea-stricken puppies out of their shit- and blood- and mucus-drenched cages and away to our vet. All of them died, as would several others in the store. And that was the end of my career as a "pet selection counselor." I was tired of lying to people about where the store got its dogs, tired of trying to convince people we were humane, tired of the stupid questions customers asked, tired of trying to manipulate them into buying pets on impulse when, most of the time, they neither wanted nor needed a dog. I told my manager most of this, and, even though I was a lousy salesperson, she said she was very disappointed in me and thought I had great potential, blah, blah, blah. So, yeah. That was my worst job ever, all three months of it.
I also worked in a machine shop one summer, and I almost listed that as my worst job ever. It was hot and filthy and unbelievably noisy and dangerous and yet dull beyond all imagining. I ran a drill press from 8 to 5. The place was owned by a racist Libertarian gun-freak who scared the piss out of me. But, in the final analysis, Doctor Pet Center was even worse than the rabidly non-union machine shop. Never mind that during my time at the shop I lived in constant fear of decapitation by flying metal, the pet store was still worse. At least I hardly ever had to talk to anyone in the machine shop, and I never had to lie about ill-gotten puppies.
Yesterday was a nice day off. I did some Wikipedia (an article on the coelurid theropod Tanycolagreus and anatomy stubs for "postorbital" and "squamosal"). We read Chapter Ten of The Triumph of the Moon ("God (and Goddess) Parents"), in which Hutton examines the role that Aleister Crowley, Violet Firth (Dion Fortune), Robert Graves, and Margaret Murray played in setting the stage for the emergence of modern pagan witchcraft in Britian. We had dinner at one of our favourite sushi places, Sweet Lime at L5P. We had an after-dark walk in Freedom Park.
And then we watched Jackson's King Kong on DVD. This was only the second time I'd seen it, and most of what I said upon the first viewing still seems valid. I still think Jack Black was wrong for the part. I still think the film spent too much time in New York. I still think the ice skating scene is silly. Etc. But it is an amazing and majestic film. I think the two things that struck me most this time through were Jackson's decision to let most of the action on Skull Island unfold during the day (Cooper set it at night in the 1933 original), and the nature and intensity of the relationship between Ann Darrow and Kong. In the 1933 film, Kong is clearly fixated on Darrow, for whatever reason, and over the decades, there's been no end of speculation on the sexual subtext. But it was strictly one way. The ape loved the pretty white woman, who was terrified of him and only wanted to scream and faint every time he touched her. However, in the new film, Ann and Kong seem absolutely smitten with one another. The affection is definitely mutual, Ann becomes Kong's only defender, and don't frelling tell me it's all meant to be platonic. Phooey, I say. I think it's one of the film's finer attributes, and a brave move by Jackson, but I do have to wonder how many people were icked out, consciously or subconsciously, at the implications of "bestiality" and interspecies hanky-panky.
Speaking of which, I'm still watching the Tales from the Woeful Platypus poll from yesterday afternoon. Please vote if you are a subscriber. So far, only a very, very small percentage of subscribers have. My thanks to those people. I'm pretty sure, at this point, that both "Pony" and "Untitled 17" have made the cut. Okay. Time to write. N is for...