?

Previous Entry | Next Entry

head like a hole

In "Approaching the Unconscious" (in Man and His Symbols, 1964), Carl Jung wrote:

As scientific understanding has grown, so our world has become dehumanized. Man feels himself isloated in the cosmos, because he is no longer involved in nature and has lost his emotional unconscious identity with natural phenomena. These have slowly lost their symbolic implications. Thunder is no longer the voice of an angry god, nor is lightning his avenging missle. No river contains a spirit, no tree is the life principle of a man, no snake is the embodiment of wisdom, no mountain cave the home of a great daemon. No voices now speak to man from stones, plants, and animals, nor does he speak to them believing they can hear. His contact with nature has gone, and with that has gone the profound emotional energy that this symbolic connexion supplied.

Jung seems ever on my mind these days. That often happens as I approach the end of a novel. But, in this instance — this instance having begun about this time last year — it seems to extend beyond the relationship between me and the novel. I'm drifting away from something, some paradigm of self-identity that no longer quite fits me, towards some Unknown. I am not so alien that I do not instinctually fear the Unknown. But it's one thing to fear something, and it's another to shy away from something you need because you fear what it may represent or the simple fact of its unfamiliarity. Or the fact that it will necessarily entail Change. In my June 21st entry, I wrote, A new Age of Me has begun. Which is a very odd thing to type, especially in a public place. But it's true. Two months later, it's still true. I'm in the first days of a new Age of Me, and everything about me is still in that soft, post-molting state. I'm drifting towards some desired reunification between myself and nature, and I appreciate that I may have readers who aren't comfortable with the idea of the "Caitlín" construct as neopagan or pseudo-Wiccan or literary shaman or whatever it is that I'm becoming, half against my will. That makes two of us — you and I, we can share the discomfort.

And the dreams are loud. The dreams are too loud.

And I'm swinging like a pendulum.

But, anyway...

Yesterday, I edited The Merewife. I made a sketch that I thought might become the cover, but I was wrong. I fretted. I also doubted myself repeatedly. On our evening walk, Spooky and I watched spiders that had built elaborate funnel webs in ivy. Then, last night, we watched Kung Fu Hustle, because Neil said it was good, and it is. It's a very charming film. Then I played three hours of Final Fantasy X-2, in which Yuna sang a truly, unabashedly insipid song to unite all of Spira. The music aside, I am enjoying the game immensely. I am addicted. I've reached Chapter Five. The "dark knight" dress spheres are the best so far. Anyway, that was yesterday.

Here are a couple of links that I've been sitting on so long that they've ceased to be "news," in the sense that they are no longer "recent." But not in the sense that they're no longer relevant:

Key Argument for Global-Warming Critics Evaporates

Warming Hits 'Tipping Point'

Okay. I'm gonna go try to find a way to wake up now...

Comments

( 12 comments — Have your say! )
maudlinragdoll
Aug. 22nd, 2005 06:24 pm (UTC)
Given your interest in Jung and the fact that you are a writer, I would recommend to you a book called "Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales" by Marie Louise von Franz. I believe she was a student of his and uses Jungian psychoanalysis to talk about the concept of..well, the title says it plainly...and in doing so, implicates the artist/writer/creative person in a vague third person analysis. I found it extremely interesting and insightful when I read it last year. And, in my own research (in which I am examining this connection between science & technology, nature & myth, the consciousness, and contemporary poetry), this book gave me a lot to think about! Of course, you probably have a huge list of books to get to at some point, but, I just thought I'd pass the title along to you because that's what your post reminded me of. :) (-- Saba Razvi.)
greygirlbeast
Aug. 22nd, 2005 06:32 pm (UTC)
Given your interest in Jung and the fact that you are a writer, I would recommend to you a book called "Shadow and Evil in Fairy Tales" by Marie Louise von Franz.

Thank you. I've read von Franz's The Grail Legend, but was unaware of this book.
avarwaen
Aug. 22nd, 2005 07:26 pm (UTC)
But it's one thing to fear something, and it's another to shy away from something you need because you fear what it may represent or the simple fact of its unfamiliarity. Or the fact that it will necessarily entail Change.

If there is one thing I've learned, it is that Change, no matter how chaotic or painful, is almost always beneficial. It is necessary to life. Sometimes I believe that it is the very essence of life. A fitting quote: It takes a lot of courage to release the familiar and seemingly secure, to embrace the new. But there is no real security in what is no longer meaningful. There is more security in the adventurous and exciting, for in movement there is life, and in change there is power. - Alan Cohen.

and I appreciate that I may have readers who aren't comfortable with the idea of the "Caitlín" construct as neopagan or pseudo-Wiccan or literary shaman or whatever it is that I'm becoming, half against my will.

I must admit that I have always viewed you as being somewhat neopagan and as a literary shaman. Perhaps you always have been, and are now only fully realizing and becoming it? Whatever the case, it certainly isn't a bad thing to be. Through your words, you've guided me (and other readers, I'm sure) to new worlds and perceptions. These stories and adventures are healing for people in many different ways, and show us things that we could not see before. That is basically what a shaman does.

Good luck to you with everything.
greygirlbeast
Aug. 22nd, 2005 07:35 pm (UTC)
Perhaps you always have been, and are now only fully realizing and becoming it?

This is what I'm starting to suspect.
mellawyrden
Aug. 22nd, 2005 09:26 pm (UTC)
I wish I were coming to Dragon*con (or anywhere else, for that matter) and have an actual conversation with you.

I don't know the right words for this, but I wanted to say I've always had a sense of you as an alchemist. . . but more than an alchemist. more of a conduit. You resonate with things most people have no words for, and shape them for us. That's magick I feel you've always had (magick, for lack of a more unique word to encompass what it is you do)

greygirlbeast
Aug. 23rd, 2005 01:18 am (UTC)
I wish I were coming to Dragon*con (or anywhere else, for that matter) and have an actual conversation with you.

Speaking of which, check your e-mail. I sent you something relevant.

I don't know the right words for this, but I wanted to say I've always had a sense of you as an alchemist. . . but more than an alchemist.

I'm a little more comfortable with either "conduit" or "shaman" than "alchemist." It's not really about changing one thing into something else, but letting something through.
highway_west
Aug. 23rd, 2005 12:32 am (UTC)
"The Merewife" sounds very interesting. I'm looking forward to reading it. :)
cailleach_beara
Aug. 23rd, 2005 01:50 am (UTC)
Literary Shamans
Dear Caitlín,

Your remarks about 'literary shaman' and 'neopagan' made me think of a book by Erynn Rowan Laurie called "Circle of Stones". Have you read it?

It's only a slim little volume but worth it's weight in gold (here's a link as there are a hundred books of a similar name) and, unlike most books marketed as Celtic Paganism, is genuine, plus the author is working on recovering the art of the filidh.

Have no idea how best to explain my own beliefs but am essentially a polytheistic, shamanistic Pagan with a fluid and spontaneous approach. I combine it with my Irish background as I grew up in rural Co. Galway and "Circle of Stones" was a very important book for me to read.

~Aislinn
greygirlbeast
Aug. 23rd, 2005 04:38 am (UTC)
Re: Literary Shamans
Your remarks about 'literary shaman' and 'neopagan' made me think of a book by Erynn Rowan Laurie called "Circle of Stones". Have you read it?

I've not, but I'll get it. Thanks!

greygirlbeast
Aug. 23rd, 2005 04:43 am (UTC)
Re: Literary Shamans
Also, Aislinn, please send me your e-mail address, to lowredmail@mac.com. I'd like to ask you something. Thanks.
cailleach_beara
Aug. 23rd, 2005 06:46 am (UTC)
Re: Literary Shamans
Sure. Email on it's way :-)
sovay
Aug. 29th, 2005 06:34 am (UTC)
the idea of the "Caitlín" construct as neopagan or pseudo-Wiccan or literary shaman or whatever it is that I'm becoming, half against my will.

Is this related to your earlier-mentioned decision to write the young adult novel under a pseudonym—if you are drifting toward another construct?
( 12 comments — Have your say! )

Comments

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow