Top.Mail.Ru
? ?

Previous Entry | Next Entry

closing in

Yesterday was a remarkable writing day. I did 2,420 words on Chapter Five in a mere three hours and forty-five minutes. Afterwards, Spooky and I spent an additional hour proofing the new pages. I'm not sure if this is The Record for me, most pages, most words, in a day, but it well might be. I just kept going, even after I felt I should stop. The scene was hard (emotionally) and important (narratively), and I didn't want to have to let it sit unfinished all night long. Were it not for the need at this point to do some research on the old railroad tunnel beneath College Hill in Providence, research which will slow me down today, then I'd easily be able to finish this chapter this afternoon — in a mere seven days. I'll have to settle for eight.

It became clear to me yesterday that, despite a half-hearted attempt at outlining this story a month or two back, it will go where it needs to go, and my intentions are none of its concerns. Not my conscious intentions, anyway. Too much cause and effect getting in the way. Which is to say, once this chapter is finished, I have to sit down again and try to get a handle on what's going to happen in the second half of Daughter of Hounds, but it won't precisely be what I thought it would be. Did I ever tell you how Low Red Moon was supposed to end in Chance and Deacon's apartment, that the big showdown was to be between Deacon and Narcissa, and it was supposed to happen there, after Narcissa performed a c-section on Chance? That Scarborough was supposed to live? That Sadie was supposed to die (again)? Well, that's what I mean. Outlines, synopses, notes, whatever, are at best contengent, if a writer is doing his or her job. Blueprints are for architects, who have need of them.

At this point, what worries me most about DoH is the degree to which this novel truly is a transitional novel between my early work (Silk, Threshold, Tales of Pain and Wonder) and my more recent mork (Low Red Moon, Murder of Angels, To Charles Fort, With Love). I thought MoA was the real point of transition, but I see that it will be DoH. Some readers, I fear, will be put off by the shift in style. Since Threshold, I've been working towards a different voice. In part, it's been a natural evolution. It just started happening one day (my short story "Spindleshanks" was one of the first signs of what was coming), and I knew I'd be a fool to try and stop it. And in part, it was a fear of becoming a self-parody. I was beginning to write like me, if you know what I mean, and if you don't, don't let it bother you. So, I have allowed change, and change is at the core of good art. I've said all this before, but after the last week or so, watching this book unfold, I felt it should be repeated. Some things about DoH will be familiar (characters, settings, tone, etc.), but some things are very different (primarily style and an increased emphasis on dialogue and story, a preference for more traditional fantasy and Dusanian/Lovecraftian weird over "horror"). If you've been a constant reader of my work, it won't be too much of a shock, but if you come to DoH immediately after having read Silk or Threshold, you're likely to be a little surprised at what you see. And with the next novel, the YA novel for which I still have no name, the changes will be even more pronounced. Of course, I'm very much afraid that I'll lose readers (and there aren't that many of you). I have to hope that you'll bear with me. I couldn't write the way I wrote Silk or Tales of Pain and Wonder forever. It would have been forced. It would have been a sort of lie. I miss that old voice at times, its density, its lush attention to every detail, its unorthodox tumbling of words and fragmenting of sentences. But, back then, I was doing what felt right, what felt natural, and that's what I'm still doing now.

Last night, after all that writing, Spooky and I celebrated Kid Night with Luigi Cozzi's dopey Contamination (1980) and the surprisingly creepy Infection (2004; Kansen), directed by Masayuki Ochiai. And, by the way, Shirô Sano is the Japanese Christopher Walken. After the movies, I was so beat that Spooky read me Burt Dow: Deep Water Man (1963) by Robert McCloskey, her all-time fave children's book, and I fell asleep as soon as she was done.

Just one more thing before I go. There's a new chapter of Boschen and Nesuko up at Anelnoath. Have a look.

Comments

( 18 comments — Have your say! )
docbrite
Jun. 18th, 2005 04:57 pm (UTC)
The few readers you'll lose due to refusal to repeat/parody yourself stylewise are idiots who would have found something else to put them off eventually, unless you were willing to just write Silk over and over until you died from sheer boredom. Readers who expect books to be written to their specifications are readers not worth having. If they have a true appreciation of your work, they'll be interested in its evolution even if they had a prediliction for the older style, and the new one may grow on them. You'll also gain new readers who prefer a more straightforward style to a lush, ultra-descriptive one.

It's interesting that even though our subject matter could scarcely be more different these days, our career evolutions continue to follow this parallel path. Maybe those eternal PZB/CRK comparisons aren't so facile after all!
tornqueen
Jun. 18th, 2005 08:29 pm (UTC)
Hear, Hear!

And when someone tells a good story, as you do, people will read for the story and characters no matter what the style.

I mean, for crying out loud, I think part of the reason Stephen King does so well so much of the time is because people are reading for the story.

Thanks for sharing part of the process behind the writing of Low Red Moon, by the way. I always enjoy hearing these sorts of things -- the story behind the story, as it were. I just finished reading LRM again and the end not only breaks my heart (because I love Chance and want things to work out well and happy for everyone ... somehow), but is so beautiful.
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:42 am (UTC)
Thanks for sharing part of the process behind the writing of Low Red Moon, by the way. I always enjoy hearing these sorts of things -- the story behind the story, as it were. I just finished reading LRM again and the end not only breaks my heart (because I love Chance and want things to work out well and happy for everyone ... somehow), but is so beautiful.

You're welcome. Those "roads not taken" fascinate me, especially in the case of Low Red Moon, because I was so sure that summer exactly how it would all turn out, and I was was wrong time after time.
tornqueen
Jun. 19th, 2005 03:33 am (UTC)
It's amazing how a story can have a mind of its own in terms of what the story is and becomes. One can be so sure and "know" exactly what's going to happen and how, but in the end, it's not necessarily up to the author's conscious self. I know there are writers who follow outlines, etc., to the T, but in the end it seems that to write that way isn't necessarily being true to the story, to the work, and it seems to me that's a very sad thing indeed.

Besides, it seems like there's got to be joy or excitement or something in the writer's experience as they watch the story unfold before them as it's written -- sort of like being a first reader and following the story where it takes you.
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 04:24 am (UTC)
Besides, it seems like there's got to be joy or excitement or something in the writer's experience as they watch the story unfold before them as it's written -- sort of like being a first reader and following the story where it takes you.

There are times when this is the only thing that keeps me writing, that gets me out of bed and to the keyboard. I've said this before. I write to find out what happens next. There have been panels I've been on at cons, and I say this, and some of the other panelists, other writers, stare at me like I've just suggested they floss with razor wire or something.
tornqueen
Jun. 19th, 2005 03:36 pm (UTC)
There have been panels I've been on at cons, and I say this, and some of the other panelists, other writers, stare at me like I've just suggested they floss with razor wire or something.

That's interesting, though not surprising. I'm guessing they look at you like that because of your method of writing, not because you find the writing difficult since writing isn't necessarily the easiest job in the world...

I wonder, though, do you think the outlining method results from the common belief that these sorts of things have to be mapped out so the writer knows where they're going, so the story makes sense, works etc.? Or do these people have to have the safety net of an outline?

Do you think your approach is different partially because of your reading of Jung and Joseph Campbell and therefore your understanding and belief in (and I'm probably assuming something here, so please forgive me if I'm mistaken) things like archetypes and the subconcious' strength in holding on to and creating stories?

But then, of course, Bradbury would just jump up in the morning, type out a couple of words, and then write the associated story that unearthed itself within his mind.

Or maybe this whole thing is just me talking out of my ass :).
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 03:50 pm (UTC)
I wonder, though, do you think the outlining method results from the common belief that these sorts of things have to be mapped out so the writer knows where they're going, so the story makes sense, works etc.? Or do these people have to have the safety net of an outline?

Well, I think people do it because books tell them they have to, and because writing instructors at universities and workshops tell them they have to, they have to do this or they won't get published, and because, for a lot of people, yes, working without a net is unthinkable.

Do you think your approach is different partially because of your reading of Jung and Joseph Campbell and therefore your understanding and belief in (and I'm probably assuming something here, so please forgive me if I'm mistaken) things like archetypes and the subconcious' strength in holding on to and creating stories?

Oh, I think it has a lot to do with Campbell and Jung (and others), in that I want a large degree of uncertainty, spontaneity, and room for unconscious emergences in what I'm doing. Outlines frighten me. I feel like, when I make an outline, I'm short-circuiting the process of discovering the story.
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:40 am (UTC)
You'll also gain new readers who prefer a more straightforward style to a lush, ultra-descriptive one.

In truth, I would imagine this to be the case. Well, I hope this will be the case. But there's this fear I'm struggling with, that all I've ever really been is style.

And I don't mean to give the impression that the newer stuff is devoid of style, that is, devoid of my voice, because it's not. But it's vastly less baroque.

It's interesting that even though our subject matter could scarcely be more different these days, our career evolutions continue to follow this parallel path. Maybe those eternal PZB/CRK comparisons aren't so facile after all!

It is interesting. I mean, these days the comparisons mostly just annoy me, as I know they must annoy you. I think it's something that people got into the habit of doing very early on — like 1995 — mostly out of laziness, because a) we were friends, b) we were both perceived as goth, because we're both c) queer and d) Southern, and e) a superficial reading of our work makes it seem much more similar than it ever was. But. Yeah. I've watched all the crap you've gone through between EC and Prime, and it gives me pause. If I have the same sort of trouble, I only hope I weather it as well.
algernon33
Jun. 18th, 2005 05:28 pm (UTC)
Wow! 2,420 Words!...I believe that is a Record for you...
It was probably because what you were writing was very emotional and it put you in a "Zone", if you believe in that sort of thing.

IMHO you should not worry what your readers think of your style change, Poppy went through that, and her work is still incredible, and yours will be too. Like life, things change.

Shirô Sano? Hm, Since Walken is an acting hero to me, I have to check him out..

-A33
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:44 am (UTC)
Wow! 2,420 Words!...I believe that is a Record for you...

I'm gonna go back through all my journals and see if I can confirm or refute it (which seems a very anal thing to do, I suppose, but anuses aren't so bad, really).
setsuled
Jun. 18th, 2005 11:21 pm (UTC)
Too much cause and effect getting in the way.

I've been thinking a lot lately about the conflict in fiction between what's logical and what's interesting. Sparked a bit, I guess, by the new Batman movie. It's a fascinating string of things describing how Batman would most logically get to be Batman, and it manages to be interesting, too, for reasons apart from the fact that it's Batman. Which was a problem with Star Wars: Episode 1--I think a lot of us were engaged because we knew the kid was gonna be Darth Vader. But once that wore off, we can see he's just an annoying kid.

Anyway, particularly when I watch Hitchcock movies, I'm amazed at a storyteller's faculty for making interesting events coincide with logical threads. And you seem to do a good job.
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:47 am (UTC)
Anyway, particularly when I watch Hitchcock movies, I'm amazed at a storyteller's faculty for making interesting events coincide with logical threads. And you seem to do a good job.

This has me thinking about how Hitchcock originally wanted the crop-duster scene in North by Northwest to involve a tornado, that he originally wanted Cary Grant to be chased by a tornado sent by the bad guys, and someone had to explain that you can't send tornados after people.

Well, unless your writing fantasy.

But yes, often that which seems most interesting is the thing that, if you do, messes up the whole affair. Like how I always wanted Dancy to have a sword, but a butcher knife made sense...
setsuled
Jun. 19th, 2005 11:39 am (UTC)
Hitchcock originally wanted the crop-duster scene in North by Northwest to involve a tornado,

That's interesting. I hadn't heard about that.

I did hear that he held up shooting for a couple hours when it occurred to him that, in the second train station scene, there didn't seem to be a logical way for Eva Marie Saint or Martin Landau (I forget which) to know which phone booth to use. He resumed shooting when he thought of a logical explanation.

Like how I always wanted Dancy to have a sword, but a butcher knife made sense...

You might be surprised by how easy it is to get a sword. My friend Tim once bought a katana at the mall from a salesperson who didn't card him or even think to wrap the thing. He carried it openly in the mall and leaned on it while waiting for his sister. No one bothered him about it. But I suppose Dancy wouldn't want to carry such a thing all over the place . . .
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:12 pm (UTC)
You might be surprised by how easy it is to get a sword. My friend Tim once bought a katana at the mall from a salesperson who didn't card him or even think to wrap the thing. He carried it openly in the mall and leaned on it while waiting for his sister. No one bothered him about it. But I suppose Dancy wouldn't want to carry such a thing all over the place . . .

I worked out ways for Dancy to have come upon a sword, to have acquired one, but none of them made as much sense, felt as right, as the old knife did.
thingunderthest
Jun. 19th, 2005 01:59 am (UTC)
Congratulations on the prolific writing day.

Your writing changing and evolving is a natural thing. I worry about writers that just seem to pump out the same type of story like they have some sort of bloody macro for it. Both writers and readers change over time, and hopefully readers grow to be able to appreciate new things. I seek out stories to show me new things and new ways of viewing the world, if I didn't want that I would just sit in the corner telling myself the same story over and over again.

Oh, and thanks for giving me another web comic to follow.
greygirlbeast
Jun. 19th, 2005 02:49 am (UTC)
Oh, and thanks for giving me another web comic to follow.

You're welcome. But you should really thank Leh'agvoi, er, I mean setsuled. It's his baby.
thingunderthest
Jun. 19th, 2005 03:03 am (UTC)
You're welcome. But you should really thank Leh'agvoi, er, I mean setsuled. It's his baby.

Oh, I will. I am almost caught up on the strip and will be sure to drop the author a thank you at least.
firebirdgrrl
Jun. 20th, 2005 01:48 am (UTC)
I can of course, only speak for myself, but whatever course you are charting...well, I can't wait to see what marvelous things are along the way.

( 18 comments — Have your say! )

Latest Month

December 2023
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Comments

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow