Previous Entry | Next Entry

"Sweeney's waiting. I want you bleeders."

  • Apr. 8th, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Tuojiangosaurus, Bowie2, cullom, Fran4, twilek2, tentacles, decemberists, "Dracorex", Trilobite, sirenia, santinofez, alabaster2, platypus2, chi (intimate distance), white2, Shai-Hulud, hogwarts, chi (in all her fears), mirror, bluenarethwhat?, Tyrannosaurus rex, leeloo, river1, eyecon, bear on ice, chi3, blindchi, Eocene, Tull2, cleav1, Jupiter, zorg1, chi4, vlad and mina, whitewitch3, invertebrate badge, mucha, Manah 1, Max, wand, Sweeny1, Fran2, Mars in space., Middle Triassic, me, tilda, mordor1, Bowie4, wookie, tonk!2, new chi, grey, Mars from Earth, wray, kermit!, Bowie5, mars, whitewitch5, twilek1, ganymede, slytherin, ravenclaw, Manah 2, imapact1, golden compass, europa, mandarin, hammy, white3, whitewitch6, number 9, chidown, mirror2, Early Permian, fry1, serafina, ammonite2, Fran7, nomi, Nar'eth4, chi6, multipass2, redeye, CatvonD vamp, sol, Fran5, Heavy Horses, dancy1, bluenareth, Nar'eth, Tull3, alabaster1, ragna, Paine1, simearth, riddick1, platypus3, meezer, chi2, Fran, earth, white, platypus, Bowie3, cleav2, kosher, kong, moons books, dr10-1, Tai'lah2, Nar'eye, do what?, whitewitch2, talks to wolves, Western Interior Seaway, sleeps with wolves, vangogh, Bowie1, Late PreCambrian Earth, river2, Triceratops, Amano, starbuck1, Fran3, Fran6, tonks!, Moosup Valley, blood, starbuck&6, HelloSquid, kong2, cleav3
I think the insomnia has reached a point where it's easier to count how many hours I didn't sleep than those I did.

It's spring outside today. It's spring, and it looks and feels like spring. High 60s today, low 70s tomorrow. The trees are going green.

And I keep forgetting to mention that the mass-market paperback of Murder of Angels is out. Indeed, I think it's been out for a week or two. With great luck, you can find it in bookshops. You can't yet get it from Amazon.com, for reasons no one is bothering to explain, but you can get it from Barnes & Noble (just follow the link above). If you can, if you are interested, please pick up a copy. Spooky put a lot of time into the corrections on this edition. And it has a nice cover (and a dubious cover blurb):



By the way, anyone who subscribes to Sirenia Digest between now and midnight (EST) on Sunday will get #28 FREE when they receive April's issue (#29).

Yesterday, we made the 3:15 screening of Carter Smith's The Ruins (based on the novel by Scott Smith). And despite having four or five interchangeable and utterly vapid protagonists, once I got past the sluggish first half hour or so (and my annoyance at the bland glamor of the aforementioned "characters"), the film suddenly comes alive and delivers a deeply chilling bit of weird fiction. Two words: screaming flowers. That ought to be enough, right there. For a short bit, I feared that The Ruins would merely be a crawl through a perilous underworld, such as that already delivered quite well by Neil Marshall's The Descent (2005). Instead, The Ruins turns out to deal with a sort of horror that occurs almost entirely above ground and usually in broad daylight, which, of course, makes its horror all the more horrible. There's something here that harks back to films of the seventies, in the bleakness of delivery, in the wonderful abruptness of the conclusion. I am reminded, in the main, of Stephen King's short story, "The Raft," and in a lot of ways, The Ruins is that story moved from a lake in Maine to the jungles of Mexico. The gore is handled skillfully and never overpowers subtler effects. Graeme Revell delivers a score that helps to move it all along. I can't say this is a genuinely good movie, if only because the beginning fails so completely, but it is a very rare film that juggles darkness well enough to artfully unnerve me. When it was over, I'd had enough, which, I think, is the way a film like this ought to make you feel. I'd even been made to feel sympathy for the idiot American college students, because the Bad Thing waiting for them in the ruins of the title is bad enough, wrong enough, that the threat to life and sanity it poses struck me as something not even those disposable fools deserved. Had the director seen fit to insert actual characters for his carnivorous Cannabis to munch on, I think this might have been a genuinely good film. Regardless, definitely worth a matinée, though you shouldn't pay full price.

Back home, we watched Tim Burton's Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street again, and it's still gorgeous and brilliant and sexy. The rest of the evening is a blur of insomnia and Second Life.

My coffee is cold, which is probably for the best.

Comments

[info]sovay wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:11 pm (UTC)
the film suddenly comes alive and delivers a deeply chilling bit of weird fiction. Two words: screaming flowers.

Okay. That's wonderful.
[info]cdennismoore wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:18 pm (UTC)
Totally agree on the slow beginning. And the utter lack of development in the characters. That lack is one of the reasons I'm curious to read the novel, hoping for more insight into them and, maybe, a reason to care. Also, I'm hoping Smith goes more into just what the hell those flowers are in the prose.
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:24 pm (UTC)

Also, I'm hoping Smith goes more into just what the hell those flowers are in the prose.

See, I think it was a point in the film's favour that we never learn much about them, beyond their abilities. But, for me, less is almost always more.
[info]cdennismoore wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:29 pm (UTC)
For the most part, I'm in agreement, but in this case they were so awesome, I wanted to know more about them.
[info]deej_1 wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:24 pm (UTC)
I noticed that you described the blurb on this edition of 'Murder of Angels' as dubious. Out of curiosity, are there any other blurbs that the publishers have used for your novels that you didn't care for, or any favourites?
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:26 pm (UTC)

Out of curiosity, are there any other blurbs that the publishers have used for your novels that you didn't care for, or any favourites?

There have been a few that I've not been happy with, though it would be impolite of me to point them out. One of my favourites is the Green Man Press' comment that Daughter of Hounds reads like Pulp Fiction written by John Bellairs.
[info]akaten wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 07:45 pm (UTC)
... John Bellairs? Really? 'Cause I read just about everything he ever wrote, at least that was published before I started middle school in the mid-'90s, and I never would have made that connection. Which, now that I think about it, was probably your point.

Got my MoA copy last week, can't wait to read it-- for about the tenth time.

Oh, and as long as I'm rambling, thanks for your tireless efforts in service to your stories; your humble readers are very much the better for them.
[info]stsisyphus wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 09:22 pm (UTC)
Daughter of Hounds reads like Pulp Fiction written by John Bellairs.

Particularly if the Bellairs-Gorey collaboration continued on it. I could squee for a Gorey illo of the Soldier/Saben neck biting scene, or the phantasmagorical entry into the Woonsocket cemetary.

Of course, Soldier would be wearing Converse (not boots) for her kicks, but wtf.
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 10:05 pm (UTC)


Of course, Soldier would be wearing Converse (not boots) for her kicks, but wtf.


That's a delightful image, really.
[info]coppervale wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 08:10 pm (UTC)
Totally off-topic - but when I did the latest drawing up on my journal, I approached it from the POV of doing an issue of The Dreaming written by YOU as part of my thought process.

Just wanted to mention that. You inspire me, often.
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 10:06 pm (UTC)
Totally off-topic - but when I did the latest drawing up on my journal, I approached it from the POV of doing an issue of The Dreaming written by YOU as part of my thought process.

Just wanted to mention that. You inspire me, often.


Thank you for telling me that, truly! It's so rare I even think about my work on The Dreaming anymore. Glad someone's still getting something out of it. ;-)

Edited at 2008-04-08 10:07 pm (UTC)
[info]akabana wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 09:05 pm (UTC)
A little FYI for the interested outside the US: the Book Depository has Murder of Angels and free delivery worldwide: http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/WEBSITE/WWW/WEBPAGES/showbook.php?id=0451461827
I recommend them heartily: the service is prompt and the prices affordable.

I added MoA on my "books to buy" list when the new edition came. I'll have to do something about the said list one of these days - it's getting to fearful proportions...
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 10:07 pm (UTC)

A little FYI for the interested outside the US: the Book Depository has Murder of Angels and free delivery worldwide

Thank you. I will post this link tomorrow.
[info]sirena73 wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 10:20 pm (UTC)
I saw this and thought of you: http://www.mcphee.com/items/11699.html
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)

I saw this and thought of you: http://www.mcphee.com/items/11699.html

My silly girlfriend saw it and thought the very same thing. She gave it to me for my birthday last year!
[info]chris_walsh wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 11:17 pm (UTC)
She's silly, too? Yay! Another reason she's a good catch!
[info]troublebox wrote:
Apr. 8th, 2008 11:32 pm (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed your film-bizarre trilogy (or whatever you want to call it). After reading "Pickman's Other …" I went back and re-read "Road of Pins" and "Flicker" and tried to figure out why they appeal to me so. Film fetish, maybe? All I know is, they provoked the same sort of horrified wonder I got watching _Mulholland Drive_ and Carpenter's _Cigarette Burns_ for the first time. So, thanks for that.
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 08:15 pm (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed your film-bizarre trilogy (or whatever you want to call it). After reading "Pickman's Other …" I went back and re-read "Road of Pins" and "Flicker" and tried to figure out why they appeal to me so. Film fetish, maybe?

Well, I know that's why I keep writing them. ;-)
[info]jacobluest wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 12:33 am (UTC)
Wait, so I could get most recent issue and the one with the Sphynx in it?

Congratulations, you just managed to do what $1,000 software, bands of any sort, or most media can't accomplish.

You got my money!

~Jacob
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 08:16 pm (UTC)

You got my money!

Thank you!
[info]pushingarock wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 02:28 am (UTC)
I could just be delusional, but I think I've seen copies of the mmp of MoA in my local Barnes and Noble for well over a month now. Thinking about that in relation to Amazon still not offering it makes me dislike Amazon that much more.
By the by--and I'm terrible at lit crit--I truly enjoyed "Pickman's Other Model." There was something almost trance-like reading it, as though I was walking the folds of Eliot's memory andor subconscious, and his voice... you really captured his era. As always, thank you for these wonders.
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 08:14 pm (UTC)
I could just be delusional, but I think I've seen copies of the mmp of MoA in my local Barnes and Noble for well over a month now.

It's certainly possible.

Edited at 2008-04-09 08:14 pm (UTC)
[info]pushingarock wrote:
Apr. 10th, 2008 03:06 am (UTC)
The delusion or the book-sighting? ;)
(When I first typed that sentence, it read, "I could just be delusional (always a possibility)...".)
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 10th, 2008 07:55 am (UTC)

The delusion or the book-sighting?

Both. Either. You decide.
[info]alvyarin wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 05:00 pm (UTC)
glee! to the release of Murder of Angels. Will be hunting that down next time I'm in the vicinity of a bookstore. Hopefully tomorrow.
[info]borggrrl wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 07:38 pm (UTC)
Off Topic: Air Kraken
Cerdwin suggested I show you this snapshot I took last night. (A larger version and information about the windlight setting used can be found over on Flickr.)

Air Kraken
[info]greygirlbeast wrote:
Apr. 9th, 2008 08:13 pm (UTC)
Re: Off Topic: Air Kraken

Thank you! That's really gorgeous. I'd totally forgotten I put my air kraken out on St. Patrick's Day.